Conchocelichnus seilacheri Radke, Campbell et Golubić, 2016

ID15893
Fossil groupBioerosional trace fossils
TaxonConchocelichnus seilacheri
AuthorRadke, Campbell et Golubić, 2016
ReferenceRadtke et al., 2016
Parent taxonConchocelichnus
Is validYes
FADSheinwoodian
LADRecent
Edit in SARV Workbench

Synonymy

YearSynonymAuthorPagesFigsReference
2022Conchocelichnus seilacheri Radtke et al., 2016Wisshak, Meyer, Kuklinski, Rüggeberg & Freiwald122Wisshak et al., 2022a
2016Conchocelichnus seilacheri isp. nov.Radtke, Campbell & Golubić2341, 2Radtke et al., 2016
2008’Palaeoconchocelis starmachii’Wisshak, Seuß & Nützel9F-HWisshak et al., 2008
2000Palaeoconchocelis starmachii Campbell, Kazmierczak & GolubićBundschuh10:4-7Bundschuh, 2000
1994Palaeoconchocelis starmachii Campbell, Kazmierczak & GolubićGlaub13:1-4Glaub, 1994
1992Palaeoconchocelis starmachii Campbell, Kazmierczak & GolubićRadtke432Radtke, 1992
1992Palaeoconchocelis starmachii Campbell, Kazmierczak & GolubićSchmidt9:7; 10:1-2Schmidt, 1992
1991Palaeoconchocelis starmachii Campbell, Kazmierczak & GolubićRadtke9811:6Radtke, 1991
1989Palaeoconchocelis starmachii Campbell, Kazmierczak & GolubićBundschuh, Glaub, Hofmann, Radtke & Vogel21:A-EBundschuh et al., 1989
1979Palaeoconchocelis starmachii gen. n., sp. n.Campbell, Kazmierczak & Golubić406-40721Campbell et al., 1979

Type specimens

TypeNumberRepositoryType localityLoc.Type horizonStrat.RemarksReferenceID
holotypeSMF XXX 863Senckenberg, Frankfurt a.M.Steigerberg quarryOligoceneAlzey Formation, RupelianRadtke et al., 2016

Descriptions and remarks

Diagnosis: The identification of the trace depends on a combination of the following characteristics: cylindrical segments, clusters of ramifications, spindle-shaped and globular swellings, and thin projections. The clusters of ramifications separated by long stretches of unramified section of thin tunnels (Fig. 1).

Description: The trace is characterized by gradual increase in dimensions from its entering of the carbonate substrate to the development of bushes of larger filaments (which in the modern setting are formed by reproductive conchosporangial branches). The initial exploratory tunnels are 100–300 (mean ± SD: 121± 61)μm long and 2–4μm wide. The advanced stages of the “vegetative” parts of the system show frequent occurrences of spindle-shaped and spherical swellings, which are shorter and wider 20 to 60( 35±14)μm long and up to15μm wide, often in serial arrangements. Diameter of the tunnels is variable with narrow interconnection coinciding with crosswalls separating cell-like units, so that the changes in dimensions are diagnostic rather than theirabsolute size. Pit connections when preserved in the borehole casts are an important recognition property.


Occurrences


Browse Categories of Architectural Design (CADs):

Borings with elliptical to sub-rectangular cross sections | Branched tubular borings | Camerate boxwork borings | Camerate network borings | Circular holes and pit-shaped borings | Clavate-shaped borings | Cylindrical vertical to oblique borings | Dendritic and rosetted borings | Elongate or branched attachment bioerosion traces | Fracture-shaped bioerosion traces | Globular to spherical borings | Groove bioerosion traces | Multiple attachment bioerosion traces | Non-camerate boxwork borings | Non-camerate network borings | Pouch borings | Radial borings | Single circular to tear-shaped attachment bioerosion traces | Spiral borings | Trackways and scratch imprints | U-shaped borings | Winding borings |