Brutalichnus brutalis Mikuláš, Kadlecová, Fejfar et Dvořák, 2006
Brutalichnus brutalis is nomen nudum according to Wisshak et al., 2019a nomen dubium (producer action not obvious)
| ID | 16626 |
|---|---|
| Fossil group | Bioerosional trace fossils |
| Taxon | Brutalichnus brutalis |
| Author | Mikuláš, Kadlecová, Fejfar et Dvořák, 2006 |
| Reference | Mikuláš et al., 2006 |
| Parent taxon | Brutalichnus |
| Is valid | No |
| FAD | Ladinian |
| LAD | Burdigalian |
Synonymy
| Year | Synonym | Author | Pages | Figs | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Brutalichnus brutalis | Wiest, Esker & Driese | 599 | 5 | Wiest et al., 2016 |
| 2006 | Brutalichnus brutalis n. isp. | Mikuláš, Kadlecová, Fejfar & Dvořák | 125 | 10A | Mikuláš et al., 2006 |
Type specimens
| Type | Number | Repository | Type locality | Loc. | Type horizon | Strat. | Remarks | Reference | ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| holotype | Praque National Museum | Merkur North opencast mine | Mikuláš et al., 2006 |
Descriptions and remarks
Diagnosis: Straight to arcuate lines on bones composed of cortical bone and cancellous bone made by breaking the cortical bone into its internal part. Ratio (width of the line)/(length of the line) ranges from 0.2 to 0.4.