Machichnus inrosus Yanenko et Kovalchuk, 2023

Machichnus inrosus is nomen dubium according to Hunt & Lucas, 2025a
ID22041
Fossil groupBioerosional trace fossils
TaxonMachichnus inrosus
AuthorYanenko et Kovalchuk, 2023
ReferenceYanenko & Kovalchuk, 2023
Parent taxonMachichnus
Is validYes
FADTortonian
LADTortonian
Edit in SARV Workbench

Synonymy

YearSynonymAuthorPagesFigsReference
2025Machichnus inrosus Yanenko and Kovalchuk (2023)Hunt & Lucas341Hunt & Lucas, 2025a
2023Machichnus inrosus, isp. n.Yanenko & Kovalchuk3153Yanenko & Kovalchuk, 2023

Type specimens

TypeNumberRepositoryType localityLoc.Type horizonStrat.RemarksReferenceID
holotypeNMNHU-P AR 407National Museum of Natural History, KyivGrytsiv quarryMioceneYanenko & Kovalchuk, 2023

Descriptions and remarks

Diagnosis. Machichnus consisting of narrow, subparallel grooves with a double longitudinal striation exposed on a small area of the substrate.


Occurrences


Browse Categories of Architectural Design (CADs):

Borings with elliptical to sub-rectangular cross sections | Branched tubular borings | Camerate boxwork borings | Camerate network borings | Circular holes and pit-shaped borings | Clavate-shaped borings | Cylindrical vertical to oblique borings | Dendritic and rosetted borings | Elongate or branched attachment bioerosion traces | Fracture-shaped bioerosion traces | Globular to spherical borings | Groove bioerosion traces | Multiple attachment bioerosion traces | Non-camerate boxwork borings | Non-camerate network borings | Pouch borings | Radial borings | Single circular to tear-shaped attachment bioerosion traces | Spiral borings | Trackways and scratch imprints | U-shaped borings | Winding borings |