Caedichnus Stafford, Dietl, Gingras et Leighton, 2015

Caedichnus is valid taxon according to Nicol & Leighton, 2023
Caedichnus is junior synonym of Bicrescomanducator according to Wisshak et al., 2019a
ID15807
Fossil groupBioerosional trace fossils
CADFracture-shaped bioerosion traces
TypePredation
SubstrateCalcareous substrate
TaxonCaedichnus
AuthorStafford, Dietl, Gingras et Leighton, 2015
ReferenceStafford et al., 2015
Parent taxonBelichnidae
Is validYes
FADLower Cambrian (old nomenclature)
LADRecent
Edit in SARV Workbench

Includes:


Synonymy

YearSynonymAuthorPagesFigsReference
2023Caedichnus Stafford et al., 2015Nicol & Leighton22Nicol & Leighton, 2023
2021CaedichnusRichiano, Aguirre & GiachettiRichiano et al., 2021
2015Caedichnus n. igen.Stafford, Dietl, Gingras & Leighton96Stafford et al., 2015
2007repaired shell injuriesSkovsted et al.324-3151-2Skovsted et al., 2007

Descriptions and remarks

Diagnosis: Excision of gastropod shell material, beginning at outer lip of aperture and extending backwards at least 5 into whorl with an aspect ratio of at least 0.3. Aspect ratio is defined as the depth of damage perpendicular to growth margin divided by height of damage parallel to growth margin. The shape of the trace ranges from slivers of shell removed from the aperture, subparallel to growth margin and potentially cross-cutting ornament; to larger portions of material removed, resulting in arcuate (V-shaped), W-shaped, or semicircular geometries. Extent of breakage parallel to growth margin is limited only by height of aperture. Extent of breakage perpendicular to growth margin is limited only by extent of shell’s whorls. Breakage profile can be jagged or clean. Breakage surface (when fresh and unrepaired) is sharp. In cases of repaired damage, the breakage can be marked by a disruption in shell surface topography. Disruption varies in depth depending on shell thickness, due to new shell growth commencing from interior surface of shell. With repaired damage, shell surface features, such as ornament or color patterns, can exhibit a slight to prominent mismatch between original shell and new growth.


Category of architectural design: 2.67. Fracture-shaped bioerosion traces.


Emended Diagnosis: Smoothly arcuate to linear excision or incision traces on shelled organisms originating from durophagous predation, especially cutting and peeling attacks. Traces propagate posteriorly from the anterior growth margin (i.e. commissure or aperture) at the time of attack. Repair scars are usually found associated with these traces.


Occurrences


Browse Categories of Architectural Design (CADs):

Borings with elliptical to sub-rectangular cross sections | Branched tubular borings | Camerate boxwork borings | Camerate network borings | Circular holes and pit-shaped borings | Clavate-shaped borings | Cylindrical vertical to oblique borings | Dendritic and rosetted borings | Elongate or branched attachment bioerosion traces | Fracture-shaped bioerosion traces | Globular to spherical borings | Groove bioerosion traces | Multiple attachment bioerosion traces | Non-camerate boxwork borings | Non-camerate network borings | Pouch borings | Radial borings | Single circular to tear-shaped attachment bioerosion traces | Spiral borings | Trackways and scratch imprints | U-shaped borings | Winding borings |