Caedichnus spiralis Stafford, Dietl, Gingras et Leighton, 2015

Caedichnus spiralis is valid taxon according to Nicol & Leighton, 2023
ID15824
Fossil groupBioerosional trace fossils
TaxonCaedichnus spiralis
AuthorStafford, Dietl, Gingras et Leighton, 2015
ReferenceStafford et al., 2015
Parent taxonCaedichnus
Is validYes
FADKukruse Stage
LADRecent
Edit in SARV Workbench

Synonymy

YearSynonymAuthorPagesFigsReference
2025Caedichnus spiralis Stafford et al., 2015Radley & Coram3, 4,Radley & Coram, 2025
2024Caedichnus spiralis Stafford et al., 2015Vinn, Isakar, Alkahtane, El Hedeny, Al Farraj & Toom2552, 3Vinn et al., 2024p
2022Caedichnus spiralis Stafford, 2015Martinell & Domènech2428A, CMartinell & Domènech, 2022
2019Bicrescomanducator spiralisWisshak, Knaust & BertlingWisshak et al., 2019a
2015Caedichnus spiralis n. isp.Stafford, Dietl, Gingras & Leighton968Stafford et al., 2015

Type specimens

TypeNumberRepositoryType localityLoc.Type horizonStrat.RemarksReferenceID
holotypePRI 68130Holloman PitPleistoceneStafford et al., 2015

Descriptions and remarks

Diagnosis:Excision of gastropod shell material, beginning at outer lip of aperture and extending backwards at least 5 into whorl with an aspect ratio of at least 0.3. Aspect ratio is defined as the depth of damage perpendicular to growth margin divided by height of damage parallel to growth margin. The shape of the trace ranges from slivers of shell removed from the aperture, subparallel to growth margin and potentially cross-cutting ornament; to larger portions of material removed, resulting in arcuate (V-shaped), W-shaped, or semicircular geometries. Extent of breakage parallel to growth margin is limited only by height of aperture. Extent of breakage perpendicular to growth margin is limited only by extent of shell’s whorls. Breakage profile can be jagged or clean. Breakage surface (when fresh and unrepaired) is sharp. In cases of repaired damage, the breakage can be marked by a disruption in shell surface topography. Disruption varies in depth depending on shell thickness, due to new shell growth commencing from interior surface of shell. With repaired damage, shell surface features, such as ornament or color patterns, can exhibit a slight to prominent mismatch between original shell and new growth


Occurrences


Browse Categories of Architectural Design (CADs):

Borings with elliptical to sub-rectangular cross sections | Branched tubular borings | Camerate boxwork borings | Camerate network borings | Circular holes and pit-shaped borings | Clavate-shaped borings | Cylindrical vertical to oblique borings | Dendritic and rosetted borings | Elongate or branched attachment bioerosion traces | Fracture-shaped bioerosion traces | Globular to spherical borings | Groove bioerosion traces | Multiple attachment bioerosion traces | Non-camerate boxwork borings | Non-camerate network borings | Pouch borings | Radial borings | Single circular to tear-shaped attachment bioerosion traces | Spiral borings | Trackways and scratch imprints | U-shaped borings | Winding borings |