Trypanites weisei Mägdefrau, 1932

ID13151
Fossil groupBioerosional trace fossils
TaxonTrypanites weisei
AuthorMägdefrau, 1932
ReferenceMägdefrau, 1932
Parent taxonTrypanites
Is validYes
FADKatian

Synonymy

YearSynonymAuthorPagesFigsReference
2023Trypanites weisei Mägdefrau, 1932Toom, Kuva & Knaust1081J-KToom et al., 2023a
2023Trypanites weisei Mägdefrau, 1932Knaust et al.43Knaust et al., 2023a
2022Trypanites weisei Mägdefrau, 1932Matysik, Stachacz, Knaust & Whitehouse7, 87AMatysik et al., 2022
2020Trypanites weisei Mägdefrau, 1932Stachacz & Matysik99E, F; 10CStachacz & Matysik, 2020
2016non Trypanites weisei Mägdefrau, 1932Hanken, Uchman, Nielsen, Olaussen, Eggebø & Steinsland20812A, BHanken et al., 2016
2013Trypanites weisei Mägdefrau, 1932Taylor et al.23615Taylor et al., 2013b
2013Trypanites weisei Mägdefrau, 1932Knaust22CKnaust, 2013
2008Trypanites weisei Mägdefrau, 1932Knaust3552A, B, 5AKnaust, 2008
2007Trypanites weisei Mägdefrau, 1932Knaust23511DKnaust, 2007b
2001Trypanites weisei Mägdefrau, 1932Fodor163:4Fodor, 2001
2000non Trypanites weisei Mägdefrau, 1932Bundschuh422:9, 10Bundschuh, 2000
1999Trypanites weisei Mägdefrau, 1932Cole & Palmer2065, 7Cole & Palmer, 1999
1998Trypanites weisei MägdefrauBertling & Insalaco155Bertling & Insalaco, 1998
1992Trypanites weisei Mägdefrau, 1932Schmidt59-603:3-4Schmidt, 1992
1989Trypanites weisei Mägdefrau, 1932Ekdale, Brown & Feibel3915Ekdale et al., 1989
1982Cylindrocavites cretaceaGhare1291:1Ghare, 1982
1932Trypanites weiseiMägdefrau151-1535:1-2Mägdefrau, 1932

Type specimens

TypeNumberRepositoryType localityLoc.Type horizonStrat.RemarksReferenceID
lectotypeTLUG 5035-701-262Thuringian State Office for the Environment and Geology, Jena, GermanyGleisberg, west slopeAnisianKnaust et al., 2023a

Descriptions and remarks

Diagnosis. (Emended after Bromley, 1972, p. 95.) More or less straight and vertical Trypanites penetrating hard substrates.

Description. Essentially straight, simple cylindrical borings. The borings are normally inclined at approximately 30° from vertical. Dimensions vary between individual specimens. Lengths vary between 20-75 μm and width between 1-5 μm.

Remarks. In the redefinition of the ichnogenus Trypanites, Bromley (1972) included dimensions as a diagnostic feature; this is considered inappropriate (see Pickerill, 1994; Bertling et al., 2006) and, as such, is excluded from the diagnoses of both T. solitarius and T. weisei, hence the emendations.


Diagnosis. Simple, vertical, more or less straight borings with a single opening to surface; circular in cross section and isodiametric throughout length.

Description. Borings narrow, elongate and circular to subcircular in transverse section; in longitudinal section borings parallel to subparallel sided (Figures 1, 2) and generally taper towards base (Figure 2.1); apertural diameters average 1.03 mm but some flare (Figure 3.1). Most borings approximately straight (Figures 1, 2) or gently curved at an angle rarely exceeding 150° (Figures 1, 2.1); if curved, a single inflection is characteristic, commonly near distal end (Figure 2.1); borings are up to 19.83 mm long with a mean observed length of about 4mm (Table 1), latter figure should be treated with caution since it represents length of borings visible in thin sections; such lengths not true because thin section only gives random slices through curved and variably-oriented borings; walls of borings unlined and smooth; although no true branching occurs, interpenetrations common (Figures 1, 2) resulting from different stages of boring discerned in stromatoporoid mounds; orientation of borings highly variable, ranging from vertical to subhorizontal.


Description and discussion. T. weisei from the Bajocian/Dinantian unconformity of the Mendips range in diameter from 0.7-2.3mm (n=442) and display a normal distribution, interpreted as natural intraspecific variation, within this range. They have an average diameter of 1.4mm. Lengths are difficult to determine, as short individuals are merely the ends of borings from early colonization phases that have been truncated by erosion. However, they extend a maximum of 130 mm into the Carboniferous Limestone.

Measurements of the type material of T. weisei have recently been made by Dr M. Bertling. Mean diameter is 0.92 mm and maximum diameter is 2.0 mm. Mean length is 16.6mm (range 3.0-54.0mm). We do not consider that the Mendip material is sufficiently different to be distinguishable from T. weisei.


Occurrences

Specimens with images (18)

<i>Trypanites isp.</i><br />Äiamaa borehole, 174.20 m, Oandu Stage <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, Nabala Stage <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m, <i></i><br />Sutlema quarry,  m,

Browse Categories of Architectural Design (CADs):

Borings with elliptical to sub-rectangular cross sections | Branched tubular borings | Camerate boxwork borings | Camerate network borings | Circular holes and pit-shaped borings | Clavate-shaped borings | Cylindrical vertical to oblique borings | Dendritic and rosetted borings | Elongate or branched attachment bioerosion traces | Fracture-shaped bioerosion traces | Globular to spherical borings | Groove bioerosion traces | Multiple attachment bioerosion traces | Non-camerate boxwork borings | Non-camerate network borings | Pouch borings | Radial borings | Single circular to tear-shaped attachment bioerosion traces | Spiral borings | Trackways and scratch imprints | U-shaped borings | Winding borings |